![]() Further, the order assessed one half of the costs of the proceeding against Dr. Buegel complied with the conditions of the order for two years, the Board would then lift the limitations on Dr. ![]() Buegel s compliance with the proper administrative requirements for record maintenance. Buegel to maintain patient health care records in accordance with the proper requirements of the administrative code, arrange for the review of his patient records by an approved reviewing physician for a period of six months, and submit a report by the reviewing physician regarding his or her opinion as to Dr. 03-1297 several conditions within one year: (1) complete a 45-hour course in the proper prescribing of controlled dangerous substances (2) complete an educational program in record keeping (3) arrange for the sponsors of the courses or programs to certify the results upon completion, and to release the records of his performance and attendance and (4) cover the costs of any and all required programs. Buegel to satisfy 1 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. Buegel s license to practice medicine and surgery for an indefinite period of time. ♣ The September 7 order adopted the ALJ s factual findings and conclusions of law and limited Dr. The ALJ filed a proposed decision, the Board heard objections, and a final decision and order was eventually issued by the Board on September 7, 2000. A hearing was subsequently conducted before an administrative law judge (ALJ) regarding Dr. Buegel s care of several patients had fallen below minimum standards. ♢ This case began when the Wisconsin Department of Regulation and Licensing filed a complaint with the Wisconsin Medical Examining Board alleging that Dr. ![]() Buegel s motion for discovery, we affirm. Darold Treffert as a witness and the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying Dr. ![]() Buegel failed to comply with the requirements of the Septemorder the Board s assessment of costs was proper the administrative law judge properly quashed the subpoena seeking to call Dr. CODE § RL 2.18(4) (2001-02).1 Because the Board properly concluded that Dr. 03-1297 actions were based on erroneous findings of fact and not supported by substantial evidence, and he was denied the ability to call witnesses the trial court improperly denied him the process of discovery regarding irregularities of procedure by the Board and the trial court improperly affirmed the issue of costs and the propriety of the Board s actions under WIS. Buegel contends that the Board erroneously interpreted numerous provisions of the law before entering its final decision and order his constitutional rights were violated because the Board s No. Buegel, M.D., appeals, pro se, from a final decision and order of the trial court affirming the final decision and order of the Wisconsin Medical Examining Board. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEFFREY A. ![]() STATE OF WISCONSIN MEDICAL EXAMINING BOARD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 02CV008310 03-1297 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I DALE M. Clark Clerk of Court of Appeals Appeal No. FebruA party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |